There have been numerous product sessions at IDF this week, some sexy, some interesting, and some about as exciting as watching Uncle Burt fall asleep in the recliner. Certain technical sessions on subjects like i7/X58 had long lines of people waiting anxiously to see and learn about the "It" product at IDF 2008, while other sessions on Intel's new SSD, Larrabee, and CE3100 SoC products generated a great amount of interest and attendance.
While those sessions were interesting. exciting to some degree, and even thought provoking at times, we noticed one particular session on the calendar that became center point on our radar screen. It had a very bland title that could easily be overlooked, "Enhancing the Media Experience with Intel Integrated Graphics", but we knew it really meant a G45 overview or so we hoped. Turns out, we were almost right on the money.
We wanted to understand more about this media experience enhancement offering, but most of all we wanted to get some answers about Intel's latest IG chipset. You know, the chipset that was late to market, promised a change in how we would view/experience high definition content, offer a superior gaming experience compared to previous IG solutions, and generally solve world hunger problems. We knew most of these attributes were marketing speak, but we have been very excited about Intel's first IG solution that offers hardware accelerated playback of high-definition content.
Why might one ask is an IG chipset so interesting to an editorial group that tends to be on the bleeding edge when it comes to hardware choices? Well, most of us are HTPC users and chipsets that offer accelerated high-definition playback, multi-channel LPCM output over HDMI, and a low-power envelope sounds just as sexy to us as the upcoming X58 chipset. However, our primary reason is that we wanted face time with the personnel responsible for the G45/GS45/GM45 series of products.
You see, the last three weeks have been extremely frustrating for us after receiving our sample G45 motherboards. We will not dwell on all of our problems as that conversation is saved for the chipset launch article. Suffice it to say, we have encountered every problem ranging from 1080P/24Hz support, lack of receiver repeater capabilities, compatibility problems with BD software playback programs, and the list just goes on. After numerous phone calls, emails, and meetings with Intel support personnel over the past few weeks, we finally had the opportunity to meet them in person.
We had our knives sharpened and ready as we wanted answers or there was going to be a fight. But before we could discuss and address our problems, there was this matter of sitting through a presentation. One that we just wanted to skip through so we could get some answers. Turns out the presentation answered several of our more pressing questions but left just as many unanswered at this point.
So without further delay, here is a recap of the presentation and some commentary about where Inel is at with the G45 product.
Facebook
Twitter
RSS
12 Comments
View All Comments
ltcommanderdata - Thursday, August 21, 2008 - link
Maybe Apple's algorithms are less aggressive, but I've never had a problem with how OS X controls the backlit. At least it darkens the screen in low-light conditions accurately. When it's light again, I usually just bump the brightness to max. Although I know the my MacBook Pro seems to use 2 light sensors, one of each side of the laptop, compared to an ASUS M50VM I have which only uses 1 in the center. I think the 2 sensors mean the backlit doesn't change unless both detect a lighting change, and since they are on opposite sides more likely indicate an actual global lighting change, rather than 1 sensor which may just get occasionally shadowed.ltcommanderdata - Thursday, August 21, 2008 - link
If they had a question period it would be interesting to ask if GMA X4500 or other Intel IGPs can support GPGPU operation. The rumours that Apple may want to move away from Intel chipsets are centered around Intel IGPs not being able to support OpenCL. Seeing Apple and Intel's seemingly friendly relationship, it'll be interesting if it's derailed by something as small as IGP feature support.