Runco Goes "Mainstream"

Much like SIM2, Runco is another extremely high end projector maker, recently acquired by Planar Systems. The acquisition should allow Runco to target more affordable price points, instead of its usual $8K - $250K range of MSRPs.

Runco introduced two new projectors: the RS-440 and the RS-900. The RS-440 is a 720p projector, shipping in December with a $4995 MSRP, or $5995 with a long throw lens.


Runco's RS-440

The RS-900 is a single-chip DLP 1080p projector, shipping now, with an $8995 MSRP. The problem with a single-chip DLP is that some viewers may experience distracting rainbows, making this $9K option a no-go for some users right out of the box. 3-chip solutions don't require a color wheel and thus the rainbows aren't a problem, but the cheapest 3-chip Runcos are well over $9K.


Runco RS-900

Runco demonstrated both projectors, but on relatively small screen sizes (and odd angles to the audience) making it difficult to compare the other projectors we'd seen.

Runco's pricing is obviously significantly higher than the competition we'd seen, and unlike the SIM2 C3X1080 demonstration, there was not a visible advantage compared to cheaper alternatives at the show. That's not to say that there's no advantage, just not something our untrained eyes could see.

Before we left Runco, the reps did fire up the big one:


Now this projector left us floored, much like the SIM2 in that respect. It threw an image from at least 30 or 40' without a problem. The SC-1 is a serious projector, but also carries a $250,000 price tag and is meant for screens measured in tens of feet. The projector weighs 342 lbs, is 1' tall, 2' wide and 5' deep.

If you're planning on building an actual theater in your home...

SIM2 C3X1080 Our CEDIA Projector Quickies
Comments Locked

4 Comments

View All Comments

  • zemane - Saturday, September 8, 2007 - link

    I don't know much about projectors but, is it too difficult to manufacture a native 2.35:1 projector? This way only 16:9 and 4:3 movies would have black bars on each side. Imagine, a true 2538x1080 image... :-)
  • Fluppeteer - Monday, September 10, 2007 - link

    Well, there are 4K projectors, if you've got the input and the money. (Or you can just run two SXGA projectors on their sides, overlapping.)

    This is the first I've heard of the anamorphic business. I'm confused: given that there's no more data available to add pixels, why digitally scale up (removing some high frequency information in the process, unless there's something exceptionally clever going on) to fill the 1080 pixels of the image, then stick an additional anamorphic (expensive and complicated, and probably not quite as high quality as a "normal" lens) lens in front of the existing optical elements? What does this gain you that sticking a bog standard wide angle lens on the front of the projector (and putting a couple of bits of cardboard over the borders if your projector has a poor black point) doesn't?

    It just sounds like a really complicated and expensive way of making the image worse. Am I missing something?
  • Guuts - Friday, September 7, 2007 - link

    The last (bottom-most) picture on Page 7 appears to be upside down.
  • BigToque - Friday, September 7, 2007 - link

    The projector could also be upside down and attached to a ceiling mount.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now